Affirmative Action in Winner-Take-All Markets∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
Whom to hire, promote, admit into elite universities, elect, or issue government contracts to are all determined in a tournament-like (winner-take-all) structure. This paper constructs a simple model of pair-wise tournament competition to investigate affirmative action in these markets. We consider two forms of affirmative action: group-sighted, where employers are allowed to use group identity in pursuit of their diversity goals; and group-blind, where they are not. It is shown that the equilibrium group-sighted affirmative action scheme involves a constant handicap given to agents in the disadvantaged group. Equilibrium group-blind affirmative action creates a unique semi-separating equilibrium in which a large pool of contestants exerts zero effort, and this pool is increasing in the aggresiveness of the affirmative action mandate. ∗We are grateful to Edward Glaeser, Jerry Green, and Bart Lipman for helpful comments and suggestions. †Harvard University Society of Fellows and NBER, 1875 Cambridge Street, Cambridge MA, 02138 (e-mail: [email protected]). ‡Department of Economics, Boston University, 270 Bay State Road, Boston MA, 02215 (email: [email protected]).
منابع مشابه
Inefficient Excess Entry in an Experimental Winner-Take-All Market
"Winner-Take-All"-markets, i.e. markets in which the relative and not the absolute performance is decisive, have gained in importance. Such markets have a tendency to provoke inefficiently many entries. We investigate the functioning of such markets with the help of experiments and show that there are even more inefficient entries than predicted by the Nash equilibrium. Moreover, this effect in...
متن کاملExcess Entry in an Experimental Winner-Take-All Market
"Winner-Take-All"-markets, i.e. markets in which the relative and not the absolute performance is decisive, have gained in importance. Such markets have a tendency to provoke inefficiently many entries. We investigate the functioning of such markets with the help of experiments and show that there are even more inefficient entries than predicted by the Nash equilibrium. Moreover, this effect in...
متن کاملAffirmative Action Programs and Business Ownership among Minorities and Women
Affirmative action programs are commonly used as a means to level the playing field for minorityand women-owned firms in public procurement markets, and therefore may be a positive factor in business entry and survival. To the extent that affirmative action programs also apply to traditional labor markets, however, they may also alter the opportunity cost of starting a business. We utilize the ...
متن کاملAnalyzing the Performance of "Winner-Take-All" and "Voting-Based" Action Selection Policies within the Two-Resource Problem
The problem of action selection for an autonomous creature implies resolving conflicts between competing behavioral alternatives. These conflicts can be resolved either via competition, following a “winner-take-all” approach, or via cooperation in a “voting-based” approach. In this paper we present two robotic architectures implementing these approaches, and report on experiments we have perfor...
متن کاملDiscrimination and Affirmative Action
The word discrimination is used loosely to encapsulate negative ideas surrounding the practice. In the case of affirmative action admissions policies at the University of Michigan, discrimination is used to justify an unjust practice. Generally, when affirmative action is debated, it is considered from a singular perspective (i.e., it is wrong or it is right). Most ignore that admissions polici...
متن کامل